- Topics of the third symposium
This third RGCS symposium will be focused on renewed creativity and collective creation in the spaces of cities and inventive ways to organize production and innovation.
A growing literature is investigating nature, principles and functioning of new work practices and collaboration, e.g. co-working, makers, hackers, fab lab network, as well as their interactions with more traditional forms of work practices, especially from the corporate world. This symposium seeks to build on these efforts to further understand the development of such collaborative work practices and their impact on society.
In addition, the symposium will seek to investigate the link between creativity and collaboration: how do collaborative work practices generate creativity, creation and innovation in cities and under which conditions? How are makers and hackers collectively organizing for innovation? What capacities do they need? What are the role of networks and meta-organizations in the local, national, international diffusion of practices and capacities?
We welcome both theoretical and empirical studies. For inspiration, we provide examples of key topics below. Papers on other topics are also welcome as long as they explicitly contribute to research on collaborative spaces and the transformation of cities:
- Repair, DIY, DIT, maker movements and their relationship with society, organizations, organizing and their joint transformations;
- Fab labs as networks, contributors to open knowledge and their translation in a corporate environment;
- Spatial, temporal, visual and material dimensions of creativity and creation in changing cities;
- The impacts of creativity and co-creation dynamics on cities, and the impact of cities on creativity and co-creation
- The legitimation and co-legitimation of collaborative techniques, collaborative communities and corporate projects;
- Historical views on creativity, creation and collaborative movements. Comparative historical perspectives on the phenomena;
- Critical perspectives on the ‘use’ of corporate techniques in the collaborative world;
- Emergence of new work practices;
- Institutional, practice, process, phenomenological, Marxist, post-Marxist views on the phenomena and their joint evolution;
- Affordance and proximity in and of collaborative spaces in the city, and how they relate to traditional business districts;
- Open innovation and how it is grounded, justified, fed by transformations introduced by collaborative communities;
We also welcome papers that investigate epistemological and methodological challenges of organizational ethnographic approaches. Such papers may aim to address several questions, among which:
- What are the roles of body, space and socio-materiality in research in management and social sciences?
- How do contemporary methodologies (e.g. OWEE, learning expeditions, “netnographies”) relate to and diverge from ethnographic traditions and practices?
- How can organizational ethnographies make use, and to what purposes, of social networks and “meta-texts” (e.g. live tweeting or sequences of tweets)?
- How do ethnographic group participants relate to each other and how does this affect the happening of the event?
- How to collectively produce scientific knowledge based on collective ethnographies/learning expeditions?
- How to conceptualize “unconferences”, i.e. participant-driven events that are starkly different from conventional scientific congress, and what can be their role in contemporary science?
- What is the dark side of these methodologies? Who is excluded from them?
Local organizing committee:
Héloïse Berkowitz (CNRS, TSM Research), Montserrat Pareja-Eastaway (University of Barcelona)
Héloïse Berkowitz (CNRS, TSM Research), Hélène Bussy-Socrate (Warwick Business School), Claudine Bonneau (ESG UQAM), François-Xavier de Vaujany (Université Paris-Dauphine, PSL), Julie Fabbri (EM Lyon), Anna Glaser (ESCP Europe), Stefan Haefliger (Cass Business School), Pierre Laniray (Université de Poitiers), Montserrat Pareja-Eastaway (University of Barcelona), Cristina Rossi (Polytechnic University of Milan), Viviane Sergi (ESG UQAM), Matt Statler (New York University), Tadashi Uda (Hokkaido University), Paula Ungurean (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia)
The event will include academic presentations, keynote conferences, panels, OWEE… and city expeditions.
Registration will be free of charge, but a small contribution will be asked for food costs. In addition, the number of seats at the symposium will be limited and registration will be accepted on a first-come first-served basis
For questions or submissions: email@example.com
- Anderson, C. 2012. Makers: The New Industrial Revolution (First edition). New York: Crown Business.
- Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (2001). Bringing work back in. Organization science, 12(1), 76-95.
- Berkowitz, H. (2018). Meta-organizing firms’ capabilities for sustainable innovation: a conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 420–430.
- Capdevila, I. (2015). Co-working spaces and the localised dynamics of innovation in Barcelona. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(03), 1540004.
- Cohendet, P., Grandadam, D., Simon, L., & Capdevila, I. 2014. Epistemic communities, localization and the dynamics of knowledge creation. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(5): 929–954.
- Coleman, G. 2012. Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Courpasson, D. (2017). The Politics of Everyday. Organization Studies, 38(6), 843–859.
- de Vaujany, F.-X., Vaast, E., 2013. If These Walls Could Talk: The Mutual Construction of Organizational Space and Legitimacy. Organization Science 25, 713–731. doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0858
- De Vaujany, F. X., & Vitaud, L. (2017, August 30). Towards more integrative research practices: introducing Open Walked Event-based Experimentations. Retrieved May 16, 2018, from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/08/30/towards-more-integrative-research-practices-introducing-open-walked-event-based-experimentations/
- Fabbri, J., & Charue-Duboc, F. 2013. The Role of Physical Space in Collaborative Workplaces Hosting Entrepreneurs. In F.-X. de Vaujany & N. Mitev (Eds.), Materiality and Space: Organizations, Artefacts and Practices: 117–134. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S.L., Majchrzak, A., 2011. Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities. Organization Science 22, 1224–1239. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0614
- Friedman, G. 2014, ‘Workers without employers: shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy’, Review of Keynesian Economics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 171-88.
- Garrett, L.E., Spreitzer, G.M., Bacevice, P.A., 2017. Co-constructing a Sense of Community at Work: The Emergence of Community in Coworking Spaces. Organization Studies 0170840616685354. doi:10.1177/0170840616685354
- Haefliger, S., Von Krogh, G., & Spaeth, S. (2008). Code reuse in open source software. Management Science, 54(1), 180-193.
- Himanen, P. 1999. Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age. Edinburgh, Scotland: Floris Books.
- Hunsinger, J., & Schrock, A. 2016. The democratization of hacking and making. New Media & Society, 18(4): 535–538.
- Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. & Isaac, H. (2016). The new office: how coworking changes the work concept, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 37 Iss: 6, pp.3 – 9
- Merkel, J. (2015). Coworking in the city. Ephemera, 15(1), 121.
- Rullani, F., Haefliger, S., 2013. The periphery on stage: The intra-organizational dynamics in online communities of creation. Research Policy 42, 941–953. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.008
- Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., Haack, P., 2017. Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals 11, 451–478.
- Toivonen, T. (2016). What is the social innovation community? Conceptualizing an emergent collaborative organization. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 49-73.
- Toker, U., Gray, D.O., 2008. Innovation spaces: Workspace planning and innovation in U.S. university research centers. Research Policy 37, 309–329. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.09.006
- Weil, D. 2014, The fissured workplace, Harvard University Press